|
Rethinking The Product Life Cycle:
Brand and segment maturity for the next century
By Tom Barnes
Page
1
2
The product life cycle has been part
of marketing strategy since the late 50's. All of us are either intuitively
or intellectually aware of its five stages of introduction, growth,
maturity, saturation and decline. Yet, this classic model now faces
the same inevitability it predicted for brands and market segments.
We all face a new reality wherein everyone knows the model, emulates
it, then with alarming regularity...fails. Failure comes from the predictability
of the strategies that we all believed were dictated by the model. Over
the past five years we've seen mature core brands suffocate under their
own weight like lost, beached whales on the shores of EDLP (every day
low price) Beach.
Marketers like Proctor & Gamble and
Phillip Morris find themselves in well-published price wars executed
under the belief that mature products ultimately come under price point
scrutiny. The success of private labels and EDLP policy at retail seem
to hold this precept up. Therefore to maintain share of market, the
strategy is to coupon, discount or die. That belief came from strategies
implied by the product life cycle. That strategy says reap the rewards
of your brand equity in the mature phase of your products life cycle.
You've already invested in R&D, advertising and marketing, now cash
in and hold share at all costs even if it means erosion of profits.
Now, as market share for brands like Tide and Budwiser wither, we must
question the validity of these standard strategies for mature products.
Ironically, the strategies implied by
the early phases of the life cycle seem to still hold their validity.
Introduction and growth phases are still driven by establishing needs
and brand awareness. These early phases are also traditionally where
most creativity and corporate resources are applied in the execution
of the model's prescribed strategy. It is mature brands and segments
that are troubled and seem to be incapable of finding creative executions
of traditional strategies. "Me too" products, new sizes, more
shelf space, and other non-benefits (new "improvements" that
have no value to the end-user) as well as discounting and couponing,
are failing miserably as tactics to revive saturated and declining brands,
segments and categories. These classic tactics are doomed to failure,
as evidenced by the onslaught and success of private labels and the
erosion of market share of many "bulletproof" brands. This
reality must force us to rethink maturity. Everyone seems to think Kelloggs
is crazy to raise their prices. Flood conditions aside, if these price
increases are turned back into marketing resources, Kelloggs could claim
unforeseen new market share. They will do this by out marketing their
competitors and building new equity into their precious brands rather
than strip-mining what is left of their value.
Page
1
2
To get the latest from MEDIATHINK in your e-mail click here.
|